comparison
Fuji 400H vs Fuji 160C
How much of the Fuji look do you want?
The same photograph, same exposure, both looks at full strength. See the untouched original.
The difference
Both are Fujifilm professional colour negative films, but 400H commits to the house palette and 160C does not. 400H pushes greens toward mint and keeps skin pale and cool — the signature wedding look. 160C is far more neutral, with only a slight cyan lean in the shadows, and was sold to commercial shooters who wanted a flat scan to grade themselves.
Which to use
Pro 400H
When the minty green cast is the reason you are here.
Pro 160C
Fuji coolness without the pronounced colour signature. A better grading base.
Side by side
| Fuji 400H | Fuji 160C | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | colour negative | colour negative |
| Maker | Fujifilm | Fujifilm |
| Speed | ISO 400 | ISO 160 |
| Produced | 2004–2021 | 2004–2013 |
| Renderings here | 4 | 4 |
| Download | .cube | .cube |
Try Fuji 400H on your photo → Try Fuji 160C
A comparison on somebody else's reference photograph only tells you so much. Both of these render on your image in the tool, alongside the other 294.